Forum

Skip to content
Find location

Blogs

Archive for May, 2010

Sales Negotiation: How do you Do?

May 27th, 2010 by Steve Barry

Sales negotiation is a perennial weakness for many sales organizations. A primary reason for this weakness is that many salespeople, by nature and/or necessity, are action oriented. You know, the “just give me my goals and get out of my way” type. They crave instant action, particularly when action equals gratification.

Yet, to paraphrase Louis Pasteur, “Opportunity favors the prepared mind.” To be effective negotiators, salespeople need to invest significant time in preparation.

It’s just like remodeling a kitchen: the prep work takes the most time. It’s painfully tedious. It can feel like you’re not making progress. But, if you skip steps, it can cost time, aggravation, and money in the long run.

It’s not that salespeople don’t conceptually understand this. They do. The most successful sales managers close this “knowing / doing gap” by broadening the definition of what “doing” means in salespeople’s own minds. They redefine progress. For example, if you asked salespeople to define negotiation, most would say that it’s the act of negotiating the price, terms, and conditions of sales with current and new customers—and winning! But what if the definition of negotiation also included the actions of pre-defining their opening strategy and concession strategy?

Well, what happens is that challenging issues (for example, price and the role of purchasing) are deliberately woven into initial conversations. This sort of “negotiation selling” requires customer insight, preparation, and a degree of flexible choreography or “process negotiation”—thinking about how, where, and when to introduce possible points of negotiation into the conversation. The stress of intense end-stage negotiations (in which the customer has the leverage) is greatly reduced, and successful negotiations result.

How about you? When negotiating, how do you “do”?

Share

Harvard Business Review’s IdeaCast with Ed Boswell

May 18th, 2010 by Steve Barry

Harvard Business Review interviewed Forum CEO Ed Boswell in their IdeaCast series. Ed explains why you need to slow down to speed up.

When the Gold Standard Isn’t

May 5th, 2010 by Maggie Walsh

Here’s a controversial thought:  lengthy leadership development efforts may have finally outlived their usefulness.

Why do I say this?  After all, one could argue that I’m in the business of leadership development—and one would be correct.

As I was catching up on my reading last week, a Bloomberg BusinessWeek article, “Can GE Still Manage?” caught my eye.  Basically, the article explains that GE’s dreadful performance during the global financial crisis (its share price dropped from $29 to a low of $6) got chairman and CEO Jeffrey Immelt rethinking the company’s vaunted talent management strategy, among other things.

GE spends $1 billion on training and devotes weeks of time to its performance review process each year.  According to BusinessWeek, its most senior executives carved out a full year of time for training during their first 15 years with the company.  The rest of the corporate world places great value on these GE leaders—often tapping them for top spots.

So what happened?  I’ll leave it to you to read the article, but here’s my take:  Today, agility and speed are the price of admission to the marketplace.  Leaders in all manner of organizations now must do more than ever with less than ever.  Although Crotonville—GE’s famous leadership training and development campus—is still a critical part of its bench strength strategy, the company is (albeit slowly, according to some critics) now trying new ideas.  For example, Immelt is now making opportunities to bond one on one with his direct reports, decentralizing operations in India, and allowing employees to serve on boards.  To some organizations, these may seem like baby steps, but for GE they constitute somewhat radical changes.

Now I ask you, if GE, long considered the gold standard in talent, management, and leadership, is rethinking its approach to developing leadership bench strength, what should the rest of us be doing?